Article
Using Soluble ST2 to Predict Adverse Postoperative
Outcomes in Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular
Function Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery
†
Ahmet Dolapoglu1,*, Eyup Avci2, Tarik Yildirim3, Hasan Kadi2and Ahmet Celik4 1 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Balikesir University Medical School, 10145 Balikesir, Turkey 2 Department of Cardiology, Balikesir University Medical School, 10145 Balikesir, Turkey
3 Department of Cardiology, Mugla University Medical School, 48000 Mugla, Turkey 4 Department of Cardiology, Mersin University Medical School, 33000 Mersin, Turkey
* Correspondence: ahmetdolapoglu@yahoo.com; Tel.:+090-505-9252300; Fax: +090-266-6121010
† This article was previously presented as a poster to the European Society of Cardiology’s 2018 Heart Failure Congress in Vienna, Austria, on 26–29 May 2018.
Received: 27 April 2019; Accepted: 5 September 2019; Published: 7 September 2019 Abstract: Background and Objectives:The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of soluble ST2 (sST2) in predicting postoperative adverse events in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Materials and Methods: This study included 80 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and impaired LV function (ejection fraction ≤ 45%) undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The patients were divided into the “high” or “low” group according to their ST2 levels (≥35 or <35 ng/mL). Results: Postoperative adverse events were more common in patients with high sST2 levels than in patients with low sST2 levels (100% vs 26%, p< 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that sST2 level was an independent predictor of the presence of postoperative adverse events (OR: 1.117 (95% CI: 1.016–1.228), p= 0.022). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of sST2 revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.710–0.913, p< 0.001) in predicting postoperative adverse events. An sST2 level of 26.50 ng/ml was identified as the optimal cut-off value, with a sensitivity and specificity of 74.1% and 75.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Higher sST2 levels were associated with adverse outcomes after CABG in patients with impaired LV and stable CAD.
Keywords: soluble ST2; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; postoperative adverse events
1. Introduction
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a good treatment option for patients with stable coronary artery disease [1]. However, the main arguments against this surgery are postoperative mortality and complications in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Many biomarkers have previously been used to predict adverse outcomes after CABG surgery, such as creatine kinase (CK)-MB isoenzyme, cardiac troponin, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [2].
The ST2 gene encodes a protein that is a member of the interleukin-1 receptor family. This protein consists of two isoforms: a transmembrane form and a soluble form. Serum levels of soluble ST2 (sST2) markedly increase during myocardial stretch. Furthermore, there is a well established association between elevated sST2 levels and impaired left ventricular function [3]. Previous studies have shown that serum levels of sST2 increase significantly after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and acute decompensated heart failure [4]. In clinical settings, sST2 level is predominantly used to predict mortality after early acute MI or acutely decompensated heart failure since the sST2 baseline is elevated
due to myocardial stretch caused by ventricular volume overload [5,6]. Moreover, in studies of postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery, elevated sST2 levels were found to be associated with increased mortality and kidney failure [7,8]. However, the patients in these studies primarily had normal ventricular function. Impaired left ventricular function has been cited as a risk factor for mortality and complications after cardiac surgery [9].
The relationship between preoperative sST2 levels and postoperative outcomes has not previously been investigated in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and impaired left ventricular function who undergo CABG. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the use of sST2 levels to predict postoperative adverse events in such patients.
2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Design
This study included 80 patients, including 19 women, with impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≤45%) who underwent isolated on-pump CABG between February 2016 and January 2017. Demographic and clinical characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were obtained from the patients’ charts. We excluded patients with acute coronary syndrome, as well as those with elevated troponin levels, acute or chronic kidney disease, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormal cardiac rhythm, valvular heart disease (including moderate or severe regurgitation or severe stenosis), previous cardiac surgery, and acute MI-related mechanical complications, such as left ventricular wall rupture, a ventricular septal defect, or papillary muscle rupture.
2.2. Ethics
The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by our institutional ethics committee (Ethical approval number 2016/123, approved on 21.12.2016). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
2.3. Blood Sampling
Blood samples were obtained from the patients before surgery for routine hemogram analysis and the analysis of biochemistry panels. The serum used for measurements of sST2 and NT-proBNP was isolated within 1 hour of collection, frozen at –20◦C, immediately stored at −80◦C, and then shipped in dry ice to the laboratory. ST2 was measured with an immunoassay (Medical and Biological Labs, Woburn, MA, USA) and NT-proBNP was measured with an Elecsys 2010 immunoassay analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The baseline sST2 level of>35 ng/ml has been accepted as a predictor of adverse outcomes [10].
2.4. Definitions
The diagnosis of CAD requiring surgical revascularization was confirmed by coronary angiography. Echocardiographic examinations were performed in all patients prior to CABG surgery via transthoracic echocardiography. Values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated after measuring the end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricle volumes in the apical four-chamber and two-chamber views using the modified Simpson’s method. The decision to perform CABG was made by the local “heart team,” which consists of cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons. We collected data related to the patients’ clinical and demographic characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), LVEF, left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, syntax score, surgical risk score (STS score), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease, number of the coronary vessel disease, serum sST2 level, and NT-proBNP level. We also collected data related to comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), hyperlipidemia, smoking,
chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD), history of previous MI, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and peripheric arterial disease (PAD), as well as surgical details, including those related to the left internal mammarian artery (LIMA), the number of by-passed vessels, whether endarterectomy was performed, the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, and the cross-clamp (X-Clamp) time. The presence of any of the following events was defined as postoperative adverse events: all causes of death, newly developed atrial fibrillation, post-operative requirement of inotropic agents or intra-aortic balloon pump, renal failure requiring dialysis, neurologic deficits (stroke), bleeding requiring exploration, and peri-operative mortality including the intra- and post-operative period.
The following postoperative outcomes were recorded: low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), which is a postoperative requirement of inotropic agents or intra-aortic balloon pumps; renal failure requiring dialysis; neurologic deficits (stroke); bleeding requiring exploration; and perioperative mortality including the intra- and postoperative periods. Patients’ postoperative length of stay (LOS) in intensive care units (ICU) and postoperative mechanical ventilation times were calculated. Additional perioperative data on arrhythmias were collected from the patients’ medical records. Atrial fibrillation of any duration was confirmed with an electrocardiogram. Perioperative mortality was assumed to include deaths, regardless of cause, that occurred within 30 days after surgery either in or out of hospital.
2.5. Operative Technique
All CABG surgeries were performed under general anesthesia with standard median sternotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in all the surgeries, with cross-clamping of the aorta during cardioplegic arrest and moderate hypothermia. In all patients, multidose cold blood cardioplegia was administered intermittently through the aortic root and retrogradely through the coronary sinus for myocardial protection. CABG was performed using conventional techniques, and complete revascularization was achieved in all patients.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the MedCalc Statistical Software Program version 17.2 (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were presented as the number of subjects as a percentage of the total number of subjects. A comparison of the parametric values between the two groups was made using the Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate. A chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables between the groups. A multivariate logistical regression analysis was carried out to identify independent predictors for postoperative adverse events. Factors entered into the multivariate model were those with p values<0.1 as determined by the univariate analysis. The predictive values of NT-proBNP level and a combination of NT-proBNP and sST2 levels were estimated by comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. DeLong’s test was used to compare the area under curves (AUC) from each of the models [11]. Moreover, the increased discriminative value after the addition of NT-proBNP level to sST2 level was estimated using the Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) [12]. Two-sided p values<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Patients were divided into two groups according to the sST2 reference value of 35.0 ng/mL: a “high” group with sST2 levels ≥35 ng/mL and a “low” group with sST2 levels <35 ng/mL. The baseline characteristics of both groups are summarized in Table1. The mean age and sex distributions were similar in both groups (p= 0.6078 and p = 0.2498 for the high and low sST2 groups, respectively); however, patients in the high sST2 group had significantly higher BMIs (p= 0.0329). Patients in the high sST2 group (n= 14, 17.5%) had a significantly higher NYHA classification, a higher incidence
of previous MI and PCI, and a higher syntax score (p= 0.0009, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Although LVEDD and NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in patients in the high sST2 group, LVEF was significantly lower in this group (p= 0.0436, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0192, respectively). The operative data are presented in Table2. The surgical details were similar for each group and there were no intraoperative deaths.
Table 1.Preoperative patient characteristics.
Variables Patients with ST2<35 (n = 66) Patients with ST2 ≥35 (n= 14) p Value
Age (y) 63.2 ± 9.3 62.4 ± 7.3 p= 0.6078 Gender Male 52 (78%) 9 (64%) p= 0.2498 Female 14 (21%) 5 (35%) p= 0.247 BMI (kg/m2) 26.7 ± 3.9 29.2 ± 3.8 p= 0.0329 Diabetes 30 (45%) 6 (42%) p= 0.8600 Hypertension 12 (18%) 2 (14%) p= 0.7291 Hyperlipidemia 44 (66%) 8 (57%) p= 0.5001 Pulmonary disease 11 (16%) 4 (28%) p= 0.3030 Smoking 39 (59%) 7 (50%) p= 0.5346 Previous MI 6 (9%) 11 (78%) p< 0.0001 Previous PCI 14 (21%) 11 (78%) p< 0.0001 PAD 9 (13%) 4 (28%) p= 0.1715 LVEF (%) 42.4 ± 3.5 39.6 ± 5.3 p= 0.0192 LVEDD (mm) 49 (41–61) 53 (44–64) p= 0.0436 LVESD (mm) 33 (28–40) 34 (30–56) p= 0.1753 NYHA Class p= 0.0009 I n (%) 32 (49) 2 (14) II n (%) 33 (50) 7 (50) III n (%) 1 (2) 5 (36)
CAD vessel no. p= 0.1189
2 vessel 5 (7%) 3 (21%) 3 vessel 61 (98%) 11 (78%) LMCA disease 13 (19%) 2 (14%) p= 0.6396 STS score * 1 (0.3–4.2) 0.8 (0.5–5.9) p= 0.3739 Syntax score * 22 (11–45.5) 34 (32–38) p< 0.0001 NT pro-BNP *(pg/mL) 160 (44–455) 1680 (750–8130) p< 0.0001 Creatinin (mg/dL) 0.83 ± 0.23 0.91 ± 0.24 p= 0.2175 BUN (mg/dL) 38.1 ± 12.7 39.3 ± 9.3 p= 0.3649
Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, CAD: coronary artery disease, LMCA: left main coronary artery, LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic diameter, MI: myocardial infarction, NYHA: New York heart association, NT-pro BNP: N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, PAD: peripheral arterial disease, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, STS: society of thoracic surgeon.* Comparison was made using Mann–Whitney U test at p< 0.05, and these values were described by median with inter-quartile range (25th and 75th percentile).
Table 2.Operative characteristics.
Variables Patients with ST2<35 (n = 66) Patients with ST2 ≥35 (n= 14) p Value
Bypass vessel no. (%) p= 0.4138
2 3 (4) 2 (14)
3 26 (39) 5 (35)
4 32 (48) 7 (50)
5 5 (7) 0 (0)
CPB time, min 95 ± 18 89 ± 19 p= 0.4980
X-Clamp time, min 51 ± 11 57 ± 13 p= 0.0574
Use of LIMA n (%) 63 (95) 14 (100) p= 0.4191
Endarterectomyn (%) 7 (10) 2 (14) p= 0.6941
Clinical outcomes are summarized in Table3. Postoperative adverse events were more common in the high sST2 group than in the low sST2 group (100% vs 26%, p< 0.0001). Two patients died during the postoperative period due to multiple organ failure. Patients in the high sST2 group had a significantly higher mortality rate (p= 0.0295), higher need of postoperative inotropy (p < 0.0001), higher intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) placement (p= 0.0020), and more frequent respiratory failure (p= 0.0295). Patients in the high sST2 group also had longer mechanical ventilation times (p< 0.0001) and longer ICU/overall hospital stays (p = 0.0041 vs p < 0.0001).
Table 3.Postoperative adverse events.
Variables Patients with ST2<35 (n= 66) Patients with ST2 ≥35 (n= 14) p Value Operative mortality n (%) 0 0 -Postoperative mortality n (%) 0 2 (14%) p= 0.02953 Need of inotrophy n (%) 6 (9%) 12 (85%) p< 0.0001 Need of IABP n (%) 1 (1%) 3 (21%) p= 0.0020 MV time, hour 8 (5–28) 18 (7–72) p< 0.0001 Stroke n (%) 0 0
-Renal failure requiring dialysis n (%) 2 (3%) 2 (14%) p= 0.0811
Re-operation for bleeding n (%) 3 (4%) 1 (7%) p= 0.6873
Respiratory failure n (%) 0 2 (14%) p= 0.02953
Arrhythmia n (%) 8 (12%) 11 (78%) p< 0.0001
ICU length of stay, days * 2.5 (1–6) 4 (2–13) p= 0.0041
Overall length of stay, days * 8 (5–17) 11 (8–23) p< 0.0001 Postoperative adverse events n (%) 17 (26) 14 (100) p< 0.0001
Abbreviations: IABP: intra aortic balloon pump, ICU: intensive care unit, MV: mechanic ventilation. * Comparison was made using Mann–Whitney U test at p< 0.05, and these values were described by median with inter-quartile range (25th and 75th percentile).
Additionally, in the high sST2 group, the incidence of postoperative AF was 23%, and AF was observed significantly more frequently in the high sST2 group than in the low sST2 group (p< 0.0001). The univariate logistical regression analysis showed that the following factors were predictors of postoperative adverse events: history of stroke, previous myocardial infarction, previous percutaneous intervention, NYHA class, syntax score, STS score, sST2 level, and NT-proBNP level. The multivariate analysis showed that sST2 level was independently associated with postoperative adverse events (OR: 1.117 (95% CI: 1.016–1.228), p= 0.022; Table4).
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for prediction of postoperative adverse events.
Variable Univariate Multivariate
OR 95% CI p Value OR 95% CI p Value Previous MI 8.125 2.335–28.270 0.001 History of stroke 7.111 0.756–66.894 0.086 Previous PCI 4.741 1.728–13.009 0.003 NYHA ≥ 2 3.250 1.219–8.666 0.019 Syntax score 1.143 1.056–1.237 0.001 STS score * 1.682 0.962–2.941 0.068 sST2 levels 1.128 1.065–1.194 <0.001 1.117 1.016–1.228 0.022 NT-proBNP levels 1.004 1.001–1.007 0.004
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval, OR: odds ratio, MI: myocardial infarction, NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, NYHA: New York heart association, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, sST2: soluble ST2, STS: society of thoracic surgeon. * This parameter is not entered to the model in order to prevent multicollinearity.
The AUC curves of NT-proBNP and sST2 were 0.765 (95% CI: 0.650–0.880, p< 0.001; Figure1) and 0.812 (95% CI: 0.710–0.913, p< 0.001), respectively. An NT-pro BNP level of 210 pg/mL was identified
as the optimal cut-off value with a sensitivity of 67.7% and a specificity of 67.3%. When sST2 level was added to NT-proBNP level, the area under the AUC curve became 0.822 (95% CI: 0.724–0.919, z= 1.163, difference p = 0.2447; Figure1). Although NT-proBNP, and NT-proBNP plus sST2, had similar accuracies for predicting postoperative adverse events compared to NT-proBNP, sST2 plus NT-proBNP was related to a significant NRI of 46.1% (z= 2.008, p = 0.0446) and a significant IDI of 0.0551(z= 2.1855, p = 0.0288). An sST2 level of 26.50 ng/mL was identified as the optimal cut-off value with a sensitivity and specificity of 74.1% and 75.3%, respectively. Patients with an sST2 level ≥26.50 ng/mL were significantly more likely to experience postoperative adverse events compared with patients with an sST2 level<26.50 ng/mL (71% vs 21%, p < 0.01).
Medicina 2019, 55, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 9
related to a significant NRI of 46.1% (z = 2.008, p = 0.0446) and a significant IDI of 0.0551(z = 2.1855, p = 0.0288).
An sST2 level of 26.50 ng/mL was identified as the optimal cut-off value with a sensitivity and specificity of 74.1% and 75.3%, respectively. Patients with an sST2 level ≥26.50 ng/mL were significantly more likely to experience postoperative adverse events compared with patients with an sST2 level <26.50 ng/mL (71% vs 21%, p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for soluble ST2 (sST2), N-terminal pro-brain
natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and NT-proBNP plus sST2, which were used for predicting postoperative adverse events.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we assessed the prognostic value of sST2 in patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG. We found that sST2 was an independent predictor of postoperative adverse events in the studied patients. The level of surgical risk was assessed for all patients using preoperative STS scores. Although STS scores were similar in both patient groups, we found that postoperative mortality was significantly more common in the group with sST2 levels ≥35.0 ng/mL, and that elevated preoperative sST2 levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of death. We also found that patients with high levels of preoperative sST2 had a higher incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (as a result of requiring inotropy and IABP), respiratory failure, and longer postoperative hospital stays.
sST2 is a novel biomarker that has been shown to predict adverse outcomes and death in patients with heart failure and MI [13]. In the HF-ACTION heart failure study, ST2 levels were found to be a significant predictor of mortality due to cardiovascular disease and hospitalization, with a cut-off level of 35 ng/mL. Risk of mortality was also found to be significantly higher in patients with ST2 levels ≥35 ng/mL [14]. In the Framingham Heart Study, sST2 concentrations were shown to be related to systolic blood pressure and diabetes. That study also found that male gender and old age were related to higher sST2 concentrations by adjusting for coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, valvular disease, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and pulmonary and renal dysfunction [15]. In the present study, no associations were found between sST2 and DM, HT, age, or gender. The significance of sST2 in CABG surgery was first evaluated by Lobdell et al. [8], who found that preoperative sST2 levels were associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. However, in the present study, no association was observed between sST2 levels and acute renal failure. The predictive ability of sST2 and NT-proBNP has been studied in patients
Figure 1.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for soluble ST2 (sST2), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and NT-proBNP plus sST2, which were used for predicting postoperative adverse events.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we assessed the prognostic value of sST2 in patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG. We found that sST2 was an independent predictor of postoperative adverse events in the studied patients. The level of surgical risk was assessed for all patients using preoperative STS scores. Although STS scores were similar in both patient groups, we found that postoperative mortality was significantly more common in the group with sST2 levels ≥35.0 ng/mL, and that elevated preoperative sST2 levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of death. We also found that patients with high levels of preoperative sST2 had a higher incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (as a result of requiring inotropy and IABP), respiratory failure, and longer postoperative hospital stays.
sST2 is a novel biomarker that has been shown to predict adverse outcomes and death in patients with heart failure and MI [13]. In the HF-ACTION heart failure study, ST2 levels were found to be a significant predictor of mortality due to cardiovascular disease and hospitalization, with a cut-off level of 35 ng/mL. Risk of mortality was also found to be significantly higher in patients with ST2 levels ≥35 ng/mL [14]. In the Framingham Heart Study, sST2 concentrations were shown to be related to systolic blood pressure and diabetes. That study also found that male gender and old age were related to higher sST2 concentrations by adjusting for coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, valvular disease, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and pulmonary and renal dysfunction [15]. In the present study, no associations were found between sST2 and DM,
HT, age, or gender. The significance of sST2 in CABG surgery was first evaluated by Lobdell et al. [8], who found that preoperative sST2 levels were associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. However, in the present study, no association was observed between sST2 levels and acute renal failure. The predictive ability of sST2 and NT-proBNP has been studied in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and both markers have been shown to improve a model classification of in-hospital mortality [9].
Ramkumar et al. found that elevated pre- and post-operative levels of sST-2 or NT-proBNP are associated with lower survival rates after cardiac surgery, and the authors claimed that both biomarkers can be used to assess postoperative prognosis [16]. Additionally, Brown et al. showed that some cardiac biomarkers such as sST-2, NT-proBNP, galectin-3, and cystatin-C significantly improved the prediction of readmission or mortality within 30 days after coronary artery bypass graft surgery [17]. In our study, we found that elevated preoperative sST2 levels were associated with an increased incidence of postoperative adverse events, including arrhythmia, respiratory failure, and inotropic and IABP requirement. Furthermore, we found that mechanical ventilation times and length of hospital stay were longer in patients with high levels of sST2.
As well as sST2, NT-proBNP is another powerful biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure. Levels of this biomarker have been found to be elevated in cases of ventricular wall stress [18]. In the present analysis, patients with elevated sST2 levels were found to have significantly increased NT-proBNP levels, and reduced levels of LVEF and sST2 were found to be positively correlated with NT-proBNP levels. Many traditional risk factors have been identified for AF following CABG, such as advanced age, obesity, and low ejection fractions [19–23]. Several cardiac biomarkers have also been examined for peri-operative atrial fibrillation and flutter (POAF) after CABG, such as troponin, CK-MB, and NT-proBNP. Gasparovic et al. [24] examined the impact of NT-proBNP levels on the occurrence of AF in patients undergoing CABG surgery and showed that elevated preoperative NT-proBNP levels are a strong predictor of AF. Our study showed that sST2 levels are a more sensitive and specific predictor than these aforementioned traditional risk factors and biomarkers.
At present, the most widely used surgical risk scoring systems, such as EuroSCORE and STS, do not include a specific cardiac biomarker variable for evaluating adverse outcomes. In this study, we found that levels of sST2, a novel cardiac biomarker primarily used to predict survival after heart failure and myocardial infarction, were associated with adverse outcomes in patients with impaired LV function undergoing CABG surgery. Coronary bypass surgery is commonly more complicated in patients with an impaired left ventricle. According to our results, preoperative sST2 levels may be used as a biomarker to predict postoperative outcomes in this population; however, more prospective and multicenter studies are needed to support our findings.
Interestingly, our research also showed that elevated preoperative sST2 levels were associated with an increased risk of postoperative AF. An association between sST2 and cardiac arrhythmia was first described by Okar et al. [25], who found that sST2 levels were an independent predictor of recurrent atrial fibrillation after cryoablation. Moreover, another study demonstrated that levels of circulating sST2 were independently associated with a history of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with right ventricular failure [26]. The higher risk of developing postoperative atrial fibrillation may result from an increase in the extent of myocyte necrosis and myocardial fibro-fatty replacement due to ventricular dysfunction.
The present study has several limitations. Firstly, it was a single-center study with a small sample size and a predominantly male patient population. Additionally, the data were collected from our surgical practice, and therefore our patient population, surgical techniques, and postoperative management may have affected the outcome. Furthermore, we had no opportunity to include certain factors—such as fragility, inflammation, or neurohumoral activation—which may have influenced postoperative outcomes. Another limitation is that our results are based on a single sST2 measurement per patient; serial measurements of this biomarker may provide greater prognostic value. Our results need to be confirmed by large multi-center prospective trials.
5. Conclusions
Elevated preoperative sST2 levels were found to be associated with a higher risk of postoperative adverse events in patients with impaired left ventricular function undergoing CABG surgery. Soluble ST2 may be a useful cardiac biomarker to predict adverse postoperative adverse events in such patients.
Author Contributions:Conceptualization, A.D. and E.A.; methodology, A.D. and E.A.; software, A.C.; validation, A.D. and A.C.; formal analysis, A.D., E.A., and T.Y.; investigation, A.C.; resources, A.D.; data curation, T.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D. and H.K.; writing—review and editing, A.D. and E.A.; supervision, A.C.; project administration, A.D. and E.A.
Funding:This research was funded by MeDar Saglik A.S.
Acknowledgments: We thank Naime Cakir, RN, for collecting blood samples and transferring them to the laboratory.
Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Levine, G.N.; Bates, E.R.; Bittl, J.A.; Brindis, R.G.; Fihn, S.D.; Fleisher, L.A.; Granger, C.B.; Lange, R.A.; Mack, M.J.; Mauri, L.; et al. ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines: An update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management. Circulation 2016, 134, e123–e155. [PubMed]
2. Braunwald, E. Biomarkers in heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 2148–2159. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. McCarthy, C.P.; Januzzi, J.L., Jr. SolubleST2 in heart failure. Heart Fail. Clin. 2018, 14, 41–48. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
4. Weinberg, E.O.; Shimpo, M.; De Keulenaer, G.W.; MacGillivray, C.; Tominaga, S.; Solomon, S.D.; Rouleau, J.L.; Lee, R.T. Expression and regulation of ST2, an interleukin-1 receptor family member, in cardiomyocytes and myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002, 106, 2961–2966. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Shimpo, M.; Morrow, D.A.; Weinberg, E.O.; Sabatine, M.S.; Murphy, S.A.; Antman, E.M.; Lee, R.T. Serum levels of the interleukin-1 receptor family member ST2 predict mortality and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004, 109, 2186–2190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Weinberg, E.O.; Shimpo, M.; Hurwitz, S.; Tominaga, S.; Rouleau, J.L.; Lee, R.T. Identification of serum soluble ST2 receptor as a novel heart failure biomarker. Circulation 2003, 107, 721–726. [CrossRef]
7. Polineni, S.; Parker, D.M.; Alam, S.S.; Thiessen-Philbrook, H.; McArthur, E.; DiScipio, A.W.; Malenka, D.J.; Parikh, C.R.; Garg, A.X.; Brown, J.R. Predictive ability of novel cardiac biomarkers ST2, Galectin-3, and NT-ProBNP before cardiac surgery. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, e008371. [CrossRef]
8. Lobdell, K.W.; Parker, D.M.; Likosky, D.S.; Rezaee, M.; Wyler von Ballmoss, M.; Alam, S.S.; Owens, S.; Thiessen-Philbrook, H.; MacKenzie, T.; Brown, J.R. Preoperative serum ST2 level predicts acute kidney injury after adult cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018, 156, 1114–1123. [CrossRef]
9. Algarni, K.D.; Maganti, M.; Yau, T.M. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: Trends over 20 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011, 92, 1678–1684. [CrossRef]
10. Gaggin, H.K.; Szymonifka, J.; Bhardwaj, A.; Belcher, A.; De Berardinis, B.; Motiwala, S.; Wang, T.J.; Januzzi, J.L., Jr. Head-to-head comparison of serial soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and highlysensitive troponin T measurements in patients with chronic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2014, 2, 65e72. [CrossRef]
11. DeLong, E.R.; DeLong, D.M.; Clarke-Pearson, D.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988, 44, 837–845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Pencina, M.J.; D’Agostino, R.B., Sr.; Steyerberg, E.W. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat. Med. 2011, 30, 11–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 13. Eggers, K.M.; Armstrong, P.W.; Califf, R.M.; Simoons, M.L.; Venge, P.; Wallentin, L.; James, S.K. ST2 and
mortality in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am. Heart J. 2010, 159, 788–794. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Whellan, D.J.; O’Connor, C.M.; Lee, K.; Keteyian, S.J.; Cooper, L.S.; Ellis, S.J.; Leifer, E.S.; Kraus, W.E.; Kitzman, D.W.; Blumenthal, J.A.; et al. Heart failure and a controlled trial investigating outcomes of exercise training (HF-ACTION): Design and rationale. Am. Heart J. 2007, 153, 201–211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Coglianese, E.E.; Larson, M.G.; Vasan, R.S.; Ho, J.E.; Ghorbani, A.; McCabe, E.L.; Cheng, S.; Fradley, M.G.;
Kretschman, D.; Gao, W.; et al. Distribution and clinical correlates of the interleukin receptor family member sST2 in the Framingham heart study. Clin. Chem. 2012, 58, 1673–1681. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Ramkumar, N.; Jacobs, J.P.; Berman, R.B.; Parker, D.M.; MacKenzie, T.A.; Likosky, D.S.; DiScipio, A.; Malenka, D.J.; Brown, J.R. Cardiac biomarkers predict long-term survival after cardiac surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2019. [CrossRef]
17. Brown, J.R.; Jacobs, J.P.; Alam, S.S.; Thiessen-Philbrook, H.; Everett, A.; Likosky, D.S.; Lobdell, K.; Wyler von Ballmoos, M.C.; Parker, D.M.; Garg, A.X.; et al. Utility of biomarkers to improve prediction of readmission or mortality after cardiac surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2018, 106, 1294–1301. [CrossRef]
18. Richards, A.M. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide in heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 2018, 14, 27–39. [CrossRef]
19. Oncel, C.R.; Kucuk, M. Predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass grafting surgery. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 2017, 17, 344–345. [CrossRef]
20. Jidéus, L.; Blomström, P.; Nilsson, L.; Stridsberg, M.; Hansell, P.; Blomström-Lundqvist, C. Tachyarrhythmias and triggering factors for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery by-pass operation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000, 69, 1064–1069. [CrossRef]
21. Mathew, J.P.; Parks, R.; Savino, J.S.; Friedman, A.S.; Koch, C.; Mangano, D.T.; Browner, W.S. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Predictors, outcomes and resource utilization. Multicenter study of perioperative ischemia research group. JAMA 1996, 276, 300–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Auer, J.; Weber, T.; Berent, R.; Ng, C.K.; Lamm, G.; Eber, B. Risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J. Card. Surg. 2005, 20, 425–431. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Mayr, A.; Knotzer, H.; Pajk, W.; Luckner, G.; Ritsch, N.; Dünser, M.; Ulmer, H.; Schobersberger, W.; Hasibeder, W. Risk factors associated with new onset tachyarrhytmias after cardiac surgery—A retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2001, 45, 543–549. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Gasparocic, H.; Burcar, I.; Kopjar, T.; Vojkovic, J.; Gabelica, R.; Biocina, B.; Jelic, I. NT-pro-BNP, but not C-reactive protein, is predictive of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2010, 37, 100–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Okar, S.; Kaypakli, O.; Sahin, D.Y.; Koc, M. Fibrosis marker soluble ST2 predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoaballoon catheter ablation of nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Korean Circ. J. 2018, 48, 920–929. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Broch, K.; Leren, I.S.; Saberniak, J.; Ueland, T.; Edvardsen, T.; Gullestad, L.; Haugaa, K.H. Soluble ST2 is associated with disease severity in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Biomarkers 2017, 22, 367–371. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
