• Sonuç bulunamadı

THE MINKOWSKI'S INEQUALITIES UTILIZING NEWLY DEFINED GENERALIZED FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL OPERATORS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "THE MINKOWSKI'S INEQUALITIES UTILIZING NEWLY DEFINED GENERALIZED FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL OPERATORS"

Copied!
16
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

C om mun. Fac. Sci. U niv. A nk. Ser. A 1 M ath. Stat. Volum e 68, N umb er 1, Pages 686–701 (2019) D O I: 10.31801/cfsuasm as.463983

ISSN 1303–5991 E-ISSN 2618-6470

http://com munications.science.ankara.edu.tr/index.php?series= A 1

THE MINKOWSKI’S INEQUALITIES UTILIZING NEWLY DEFINED GENERALIZED FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL

OPERATORS

FUAT USTA, HÜSEYIN BUDAK, FATMA ERTUGRAL, AND MEHMET ZEKI SARIKAYA

Abstract. Motivated by the recent generalized fractional integral operators proposed by Tunc et. al. [22], we establish a generalization of the reverse Minkowski’s inequalities. Within this context, we provide new upper bounds of inequalities utilizing generalized fractional integral operators and show and state other inequalities related to this fractional integral operator.

1. Introduction

Recently, a number of scientist in the …eld of mathematics have introduced di¤er-ent results about the fractional derivatives and integrals such as Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative, Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator, Hadamard in-tegral operator, Saigo fractional inin-tegral operator and some other, and applied them to some well-know inequalities with applications [1]-[22]. In this paper the authors will provide the some reverse Minkowski’s inequalities by means of the generalized fractional integral operators.

The overall structure of the study takes the form of four sections including in-troduction. The remaining part of the paper proceeds as follows: In Section 2, we introduce generalized k-fractional integrals of a function with respect to the another function which generalizes di¤erent types of fractional integrals, including Riemann-Lioville fractional, Hadamard fractional integrals, Katugampola fractional integral, (k; s)-fractional integral operators and many others. In section 3, we provide the main results involving the reverse Minkowski’s inequality with the help of frac-tional integral operators while in section 4 discussing other inequalities using this fractional integral operators. Finally concluding remarks summarize the article.

Received by the editors: September 12, 2017; Accepted: April 06, 2018. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classi…cation. 26D15, 26A33, 26B25, 26D10.

Key words and phrases. Fractional integral operators, Hermite-Hadamard inequality, midpoint inequality, convex function.

c 2 0 1 8 A n ka ra U n ive rsity C o m m u n ic a tio n s Fa c u lty o f S c ie n c e s U n ive rs ity o f A n ka ra -S e rie s A 1 M a t h e m a t ic s a n d S ta t is t ic s

(2)

2. New Generalized Fractional Integral Operators

In this section we will review the concept of the generalized k-fractional integrals of a function with respect to the another function introduced by Tunc et.al.[22]. De…nition 1. In [8] Diaz and Pariguan have de…ned k -gamma function k that

is generalization of the classical gamma. k is given by formula k(x) = lim

n!1

n!kn(nk)xk 1

(x)n;k

k > 0:

It has shown that Mellin transform of the exponential function e tkk is the k-gamma

function, clearly given by

k( ) := Z 1 0 e tkkt 1dt: Obviously, k(x + k) = x k(x) ; (x) = lim k!1 k(x) and k(x) = k x k 1 (x k):

De…nition 2. Let de…ne the function F ;;k(x) := 1 X m=0 (m) k k( km + ) xm ( ; > 0; jxj < R) ;

where the coe¢ cients (m) (m 2 N0= N[ f0g) is a bounded sequence of positive

real numbers and R is the set of real numbers.

De…nition 3. For k > 0; let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : The left and right sided

generalized k-fractional integrals of f with respect to the function g on [a; b] are de…ned, respectively, as follows:

J ; ;a+;!;k;g f (x) = x Z a g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ] f (t)dt; x > a; (2.1) and J ; ;b ;!;k;g f (x) = b Z x g0(t) (g(t) g(x))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(t) g(x)) ] f (t)dt; x < b; (2.2) where ; > 0; ! 2 R.

Remark 1. The signi…cant special cases of the integral operators (2.1) and (2.2) are mentioned below:

1) For k = 1; operator in (2.1) leads to generalized fractional integral of f with respect to the function g on [a; b] : This relation is given by

J ; ;a+;!;g f (x) = x Z a g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 F ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ] f (t)dt; x > a:

(3)

2) For g(t) = t; operator in (2.1) leads to generalized k-fractional integral of f . This relation is given by

J ; ;a+;!;k f (x) = x Z a (x t)k 1F ;k ; [! (x t) ] f (t)dt; x > a:

3) For g(t) = ln t; operator in (2.1) leads to generalized Hadamard k-fractional integral of f . This relation is given by

H; ;a+;!;k f (x) = x Z a lnx t k 1 F ;;k h ! lnx t i f (t)dt t ; x > a: 4) For g(t) = ts+1

s+1; s 2 R f 1g operator in (2.1) leads to generalized (k;

s)-fractional integral of f . This relation is given by

s J ; ;a+;!;k f (x) = (s+1) 1 k x Z a xs+1 ts+1 k 1tr F;;k ! xs+1 ts+1 s + 1 f (t)dt; x > a: Remark 2. Similarly, all above special cases can also be seen for operator (2.2).

Remark 3. For k = 1 and g(t) = t; operators in (2.1) and (2.2) reduce to the following generalized fractional integral operators de…ned by Raina [21] and Agarwal et. al [1], respectively: J ; ;a+;!f (x) = Z x a (x t) 1F ; [! (x t) ] f (t)dt; x > a; (2.3) J ; ;b ;!f (x) = Z b x (t x) 1F ; [! (t x) ] f (t)dt; x < b; (2.4) Remark 4. One can obtain other new generalized fractional integral operators with di¤ erent choices of g.

Remark 5. For = ; (0) = 1; w = 0 in De…nition 3, then we have the generalized fractional operators de…ned by Akkurt et al. in [3].

Remark 6. Let = ; (0) = 1; w = 0 in De…nition 3.

1) Choosing k = 1; then we have fractional integrals of a function f with respect to function g: [12].

2) Choosing g(t) = t, then we have k-fractional integrals [15].

3) Choosing k = 1 and g(t) = ln t, then we have Hadamard fractional integrals [12].

4) Choosing g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g, then we have (k; s)-fractional integral operators [18].

5) Choosing k = 1 and g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g, then we have Katugampola fractional integral operators [9].

(4)

6) Choosing k = 1 and g(t) = t, then we have Riemann-Lioville fractional integral operators [12].

3. Reverse Minkowski Fractional Integral Inequality new generalized fractional integral operators

Theorem 1. Let u; v 2 Xp

c(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x >

a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J ;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : If

0 < m u(t)v(t) M and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 1 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;k;g vp(x)i 1 p C1 h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p(x)i 1 p where C1=M (m+1)+M +1(M +1)(m+1) and p 1; ; > 0; ! 2 R.

Proof. Since u(t)v(t) M; t 2 [a; x] ; we deduce that u(t) M [u(t) + v(t)] M u(t) which yields up(t) M M + 1 p [u(t) + v(t)]p: (3.1) Then multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (3.1) and integrating on [a; x], we get

x Z a g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ] u p(t)dt M M + 1 pZx a g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ] [u(t) + v(t)] p dt: As a result, we deduce that

h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 1 p M M + 1 h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p(x)i 1 p : (3.2)

On the other hand, as m u(t)v(t); t 2 [a; x], we have

vp(t) 1

m + 1

p

(5)

Similarly, multiplying by g0(t)

(g(x) g(t))1 kF

;k

; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (3.3) and integrating on [a; x], we get h J ; ;a+;!;k;g v p(x)i 1 p 1 m + 1 h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p(x)i 1 p : (3.4)

Then adding the inequalities (3.2) and (3.4), the desired result has been obtained.

Corollary 1. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 1 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 1, we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g

sh J ; ;a+;!;g u p(x)i 1 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;g vp(x)i 1 p C1 h J ; ;a+;!;g (u + v) p(x)i 1 p : 2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 1, we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

sh J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 p + h J ; ;a+;!;k v p(x)i 1 p C1 h J ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) p(x)i 1 p : 3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 1, we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequal-ity associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

sh H ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 p + h H ; ;a+;!;k vp(x) i1 p C1 h H ; ;a+;!;k (u + v)p(x) i1 p : 4) For g(t) = ts+1

s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 1, we have the following reverse

Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals

shs J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 p +hsJ ; ;a+;!;k vp(x)i 1 p C1 h s J ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) p(x)i 1 p : Theorem 2. Let u; v 2 Xp

c(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x >

a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J ;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : If

0 < m u(t)v(t) M and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 2 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;k;g vp(x)i 2 p C2 h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 1 ph J ; ;a+;!;k;g v p(x)i 1 p where C1=(M +1)(m+1)M 2 and p 1; ; > 0; ! 2 R.

(6)

Proof. From the inequalities (3.2) and (3.4), we have (M + 1)(m + 1) M h J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) i1 ph J ; ;a+;!;k;g vp(x) i1 p h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v)p(x) i2 p : (3.5) Then, thanks to the Minkowski’s inequality, we get

h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v)p(x) i2 p h J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) i1 p + h J ; ;a+;!;k;g vp(x) i1 p 2 : (3.6) Consequently, by substituting (3.6) into (3.5), we obtain the desired result. Corollary 2. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 2 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 2, we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g h J ; ;a+;!;g up(x) i2 p + h J ; ;a+;!;g vp(x) i2 p C2 h J ; ;a+;!;g up(x) i1 ph J ; ;a+;!;g vp(x) i1 p : 2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 2, we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

h J ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i2 p + h J ; ;a+;!;k vp(x) i2 p C2 h J ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 ph J ; ;a+;!;k vp(x) i1 p : 3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 2, we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequal-ity associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

h H ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i2 p + h H ; ;a+;!;k vp(x) i2 p C2 h H ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 ph H ; ;a+;!;k vp(x) i1 p : 4) For g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 2, we have the following reverse Minkowski’s inequality associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals h s J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 2 p + h s J ; ;a+;!;k v p(x)i 2 p C2 h s J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 phs J ; ;a+;!;k v p(x)i 1 p : 4. Alternative Fractional Integral Inequalities with new

generalized fractional integral operators Theorem 3. Let u; v 2 Xp

c(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x >

a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J ;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : If

0 < m u(t)v(t) M and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g

h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 1 ph J ; ;a+;!;k;g v p(x)i 1 p C3 h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p(x)i 1 p where C3= Mm 1 pq ; 1p+1q = 1; p 1 and ; > 0; ! 2 R.

(7)

Proof. Since u(t)v(t) M; t 2 [a; x] ; we deduce that v1q(t) 1 M 1 q u1q(t) which yields u1p(t)v 1 q(t) 1 M 1 q u(t): (4.1) Multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.1) and integrating on [a; x], we get 1 M 1 q J ; ;a+;!;k;g u(x) J ;k;g ; ;a+;!u 1 p(x)v1q(x); i.e. 1 M 1 pq h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u(x) i1 p h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u 1 p(x)v 1 q(x) i1 p : (4.2)

More over, as m u(t)v(t); t 2 [a; x] ; we have mp1v 1 p(t) u 1 p(t) which gives m1pv(t) u1p(t)v1q(t): (4.3) Then, multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.3) and integrating on [a; x], we get mpq1 h J ; ;a+;!;k;g v(x) i1 p h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u 1 p(x)v 1 q(x) i1 p : (4.4)

Considering the inequalities (4.2) and (4.4), we obtain the required result. Corollary 3. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 3 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 3, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g

h J ; ;a+;!;g u p(x)i 1 ph J ; ;a+;!;g v p(x)i 1 p C3 h J ; ;a+;!;g (u + v) p(x)i 1 p : 2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 3, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

h J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 ph J ; ;a+;!;k v p(x)i 1 p C3 h J ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) p(x)i 1 p :

(8)

3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 3, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

h H ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 ph H ; ;a+;!;k v p(x)i 1 p C3 h H ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) p(x)i 1 p : 4) For g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 3, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals

h s J ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 phs J ; ;a+;!;k vp(x) i1 p C3 h s J ; ;a+;!;k (u + v)p(x) i1 p : Theorem 4. Let u; v 2 Xp

c(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x >

a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J ;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : If

0 < m u(t)v(t) M and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g

J ; ;a+;!;k;g u(x)v(x) C4J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u

p+ vp)(x) + C 5J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u q+ vq)(x) where C4 = 2 p 1 p M M +1 p ; C5 = 2 q 1 q 1 m+1 q ; 1 p+ 1 q = 1; p 1 and ; > 0; ! 2 R. Proof. Multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (3.1) and integrating on [a; x], we get J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x) M M + 1 p J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p(x): (4.5)

As m u(t)v(t); t 2 [a; x], we have

vq(t) 1 m + 1 q [u(t) + v(t)]q: (4.6) Similarly, multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.6) and integrating on [a; x], we get J ; ;a+;!;k;g vq(x)

1 m + 1

q

(9)

Applying the Young inequality, we have u(t)v(t) u p(t) p + vq(t) q (4.8) and multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.8) and integrating on [a; x], we get J ; ;a+;!;k;g (uv) (x) 1 pJ ;k;g ; ;a+;!up(x) + 1 qJ ;k;g ; ;a+;!vq(x): (4.9)

Then, by substituting the inequalities (4.5) and (4.7) into (4.9), we obtain

s J; ;a+;!;k;g (uv) (x) 1 p M M + 1 !p J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v)p(x) +1 q 1 m + 1 !q J; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v)q(x): ( 4 . 1 0 )

Using the fact that (a; b)r 2r 1(ar+ br); r > 1; a; b 0 in the right hand side of

the inequality (4.10), we have

s J; ;a+;!;k;g (uv) (x) 1 p M M + 1 !p J; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v)p(x) +1 q 1 m + 1 !q J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v)q(x) 1 p M M + 1 !p 2p 1J ; ;a+;!;k;g (up+ vp)(x) +1 q 1 m + 1 !q 2q 1J ; ;a+;!;k;g (uq+ vq)(x):

Thus, the proof is completed.

Corollary 4. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 4 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 4, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g

J ; ;a+;!;g u(x)v(x) C4J ; ;a+;!;g (up+ vp)(x) + C5J ; ;a+;!;g (uq+ vq)(x):

2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 4, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

J ; ;a+;!;k u(x)v(x) C4J ; ;a+;!;k (u

p+ vp)(x) + C

5J ; ;a+;!;k (u

q+ vq)(x):

3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 4, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

H ; ;a+;!;k u(x)v(x) C4H ; ;a+;!;k (u

p+ vp)(x) + C

5H ; ;a+;!;k (u

q+ vq)(x):

4) For g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 4, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals

s J ; ;a+;!;k u(x)v(x) C s 4J ;k ; ;a+;!(u p+ vp)(x) + Cs 5J ;k ; ;a+;!(u q+ vq)(x):

(10)

Theorem 5. Let u; v 2 Xp

c(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x >

a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J ;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : If

0 < n < m u(t)v(t) M and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following inequalities associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g

M + 1 M n h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 1 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;k;g vq(x)i 1 p m + 1 m c h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p where p 1 and ; > 0; ! 2 R.

Proof. From the assumption 0 < n < m u(t)v(t) M , we have

m n u(t) nv(t) v(t) M n which yields (u(t) nv(t))p (M n)p v p(t) (u(t) nv(t)) p (m n)p : (4.11) Similarly, we obtain 1 M v(t) u(t) 1 m ) 1 M 1 n v(t) u(t) 1 n 1 m 1 n ) m n mn u(t) nv(t) nu(t) M n M n which yields Mp (M n)p(u(t) nv(t)) p up(t) m p (m n)p(u(t) nv(t)) p : (4.12) Multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.11) and integrating on [a; x], we get

s 1 M n h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u(x) nv(x))p i 1 p hJ ;k;g ; ;a+;!vq(x) i 1p 1 m c h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u(x) nv(x))p i 1 p : ( 4 . 1 3 )

Following the similar steps for (4.12), we obtain

s M M n h J; ;a+;!;k;g (u(x) nv(x))p i 1 p hJ ;k;g ; ;a+;!uq(x) i 1p m m c h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u(x) nv(x))p i 1 p : ( 4 . 1 4 )

Considering the inequalities (4.13) and (4.14), we obtain the required result. In order to validate our result we can show that MM +1n m nm+1. That is, from the assumption 0 < n < m u(t)v(t) M , we have

mn+m mn+M M n+M ) (M+1)(m n) (m+1)(M n) ) M + 1

M n

m + 1 m n:

(11)

Corollary 5. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 5 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 5, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g

M + 1 M n h J ; ;a+;!;g (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p h J ; ;a+;!;g up(x) i1 p + h J ; ;a+;!;g vq(x) i1 p m + 1 m c h J ; ;a+;!;g (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p : 2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 5, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

M + 1 M n h J ; ;a+;!;k (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p h J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;k vq(x)i 1 p m + 1 m c h J ; ;a+;!;k (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p : 3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 5, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

M + 1 M n h H; ;a+;!;k (u(x) nv(x)) pi1p h H; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 p + h H ; ;a+;!;k vq(x) i1 p m + 1 m c h H; ;a+;!;k (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p : 4) For g(t) = ts+1

s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 5, we have the following inequality

associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals M + 1 M n h s J ; ;a+;!;k (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p hs J ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 p + h s J ; ;a+;!;k vq(x) i1 p m + 1 m c h s J ; ;a+;!;k (u(x) nv(x)) pi 1 p : Theorem 6. Let u; v 2 Xcp(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x > a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J

;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : If 0 u(t) ; 0 ' v(t) and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following inequalities associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g h J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) i1 p + h J ; ;a+;!;k;g vq(x) i1 p C6 h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p (x) i1 p where C6= ( + )+ ('+ )( + )('+ ) p 1 and ; > 0; ! 2 R.

Proof. From the assumptions of 0 u(t) and 0 ' v(t) , we

deduce that 1 1 v(t) 1 ' ) u(t) v(t) '

(12)

which yields vp(t) + p (u(t) + v(t))p (4.15) and up(t) ' + p (u(t) + v(t))p: (4.16) Multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.15) and (4.16), then integrating on [a; x], we get h J ; ;a+;!;k;g v q(x)i 1 p + h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p (x)i 1 p (4.17) and h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 1 p ' + h J ; ;a+;!;k;g (u + v) p (x) i1 p ; (4.18)

respectively. Adding the inequalities (4.17) and (4.18), we obtain the desired result.

Corollary 6. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 6 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 6, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g

h J ; ;a+;!;g u p(x)i 1 p + h J ; ;a+;!;g v q(x)i 1 p C6 h J ; ;a+;!;g (u + v) p (x) i1 p : 2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 6, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

h J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 p + h J ; ;a+;!;k v q(x)i 1 p C6 h J ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) p (x) i1 p : 3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 6, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

h H ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 p +hH ; ;a+;!;k vq(x)i 1 p C6 h H ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) p (x)i 1 p : 4) For g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 6, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals

h s J ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 p + h s J ; ;a+;!;k vq(x) i1 p C6 h s J ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) p (x) i1 p : Theorem 7. Let u; v 2 Xp

c(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x >

a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J ;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

(13)

0 < m u(t)v(t) M and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following inequalities associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g

1 MJ ;k;g ; ;a+;!(uv) (x) 1 (m + 1)(M + 1)J ;k;g ; ;a+;!(u + v) 2 (x) 1 mJ ;k;g ; ;a+;!(uv) (x) where ; > 0; ! 2 R.

Proof. From the assumption 0 < m u(t)v(t) M; we get

(m + 1)v(t) u(t) + v(t) (M + 1)v(t): (4.19) Also we have, M + 1 M u(t) u(t) + v(t) m + 1 m u(t): (4.20)

From the inequalities (4.19) and (4.20), we deduce that 1 Mu(t)v(t) (u(t) + v(t))2 (m + 1)(M + 1) 1 mu(t)v(t): (4.21) Multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.21), then integrating on [a; x], we obtain the required result. Corollary 7. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 7 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 7, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g

1 MJ ;g ; ;a+;!(uv) (x) 1 (m + 1)(M + 1)J ;g ; ;a+;!(u + v) 2 (x) 1 mJ ;g ; ;a+;!(uv) (x):

2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 7, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

1 MJ ;k ; ;a+;!(uv) (x) 1 (m + 1)(M + 1)J ;k ; ;a+;!(u + v) 2 (x) 1 mJ ;k ; ;a+;!(uv) (x):

3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 7, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

1 MH ;k ; ;a+;!(uv) (x) 1 (m + 1)(M + 1)H ;k ; ;a+;!(u + v) 2 (x) 1 mH ;k ; ;a+;!(uv) (x):

4) For g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 7, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals

1 M s J ; ;a+;!;k (uv) (x) 1 (m + 1)(M + 1) s J ; ;a+;!;k (u + v) 2 (x) 1 m s J ; ;a+;!;k (uv) (x):

(14)

Theorem 8. Let u; v 2 Xp

c(a; x) two positive functions in [0; 1), such that 8x >

a; J ; ;a+;!;k;g up(x) < 1 and J ;k;g

; ;a+;!vp(x) < 1. Let g : [a; b] ! R be an increasing

and positive monotone function having a continuous derivative g0(x) on (a; b) : If

0 < m u(t)v(t) M and 8t 2 [0; x] ; then we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals with respect to the function g

h J ; ;a+;!;k;g u p(x)i 1 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;k;g vp(x)i 1 p 2hJ ; ;a+;!;k;g hp(u(x); v(x))i 1 p where h(u(x); v(x)) = max M M m + 1 u(x) M v(x) ; (m + M )v(x) u(x) m with p 1 and ; > 0; ! 2 R.

Proof. From the assumption 0 < m u(t)v(t) M , we have 0 < m M + m u(t)

v(t) (4.22)

By the inequality (4.22), we get

v(t) < (m + M )v(x) u(x)

m h(u(t); v(t)): (4.23)

On the other hand, we have 1 M 1 M + 1 m v(t) u(t) which yields u(t) M M m + 1 u(x) M v(x) h(u(t); v(t)): (4.24)

Then, using the inequalities (4.23) and (4.24), we obtain

up(t) + vp(t) 2hp(u(t); v(t)): (4.25) Multiplying by g0(t) (g(x) g(t))1 kF ;k ; [! (g(x) g(t)) ]

both sides of (4.25), then integrating on [a; x], we obtain the desired result. Corollary 8. We assume that the conditions of Theorem 8 hold.

1) For k = 1 in Theorem 8, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized fractional integrals with respect to the function g

h J ; ;a+;!;g u p(x)i 1 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;g vp(x)i 1 p 2hJ ; ;a+;!;g hp(u(x); v(x))i 1 p :

(15)

2) For g(t) = t in Theorem 8, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized k-fractional integrals

h J ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 p +hJ ; ;a+;!;k vp(x)i 1 p 2hJ ; ;a+;!;k hp(u(x); v(x))i 1 p : 3) For g(t) = ln t in Theorem 8, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized Hadamard k-fractional integrals

h H ; ;a+;!;k u p(x)i 1 p + h H ; ;a+;!;k v p(x)i 1 p 2 h H ; ;a+;!;k h p(u(x); v(x))i 1 p : 4) For g(t) = ts+1s+1; s 2 R f 1g in Theorem 8, we have the following inequality associated with the generalized (k; s)-fractional integrals

h s J ; ;a+;!;k up(x) i1 p + h s J ; ;a+;!;k vp(x) i1 p 2 h s J ; ;a+;!;k hp(u(x); v(x)) i1 p : 5. Concluding Remarks

In this research we introduced the generalization of the reverse Minkowski’s in-equalities using generalized fractional integral operator. In order to validate that their generalized behavior, we show the relation of our results with previously pub-lished ones.

References

[1] Agarwal, R. P., Luo M.-J. and Raina, R. K., On Ostrowski type inequalities, Fasciculi Math-ematici, 24, De Gruyter, (2016) doi:10.1515/fascmath-2016-0001.

[2] Agarwal P. and Restrepo, J. E., An extension by means of !-weighted classes of the general-ized Riemann-Liouville k-fractional integral inequalities, (pending).

[3] Akkurt, A., Y¬ld¬r¬m, M. E. and Y¬ld¬r¬m, H., On some integral inequalities for (k; h)-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, New Trends in Mathematical Science, 4 (2016), no. 2, 138–138.

[4] Bougo¤a, L., On Minkowski and Hardy integral inequality, J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math. 7 (2006).

[5] Chinchane, V.L., New approach to Minkowski fractional inequalities using generalized kfrac-tional integral operator, arXiv:1702.05234v1 [math.CA].

[6] Chinchane V.L. and Pachpatte, D. B., New fractional inequalities via Hadamard fractional integral, Internat. J. Functional Analyisis, Operator Theory and Application, 5(3)(2013), 165-176.

[7] Dahmani, Z., On Minkowski and Hermite-Hadamard integral inequalities via fractional inte-gration, Ann. Funct. Anal., 1(1)(2010), 51-58.

[8] Diaz R. and Pariguan, E., On hypergeometric functions and Pochhammer k symbol, Di-vulg.Math, 15, (2007), 179- 192.

[9] Katugampola, U., New approach to a generalized fractional integral, Applied Mathematics and Computation (2011).xxxxxxxxxxx

[10] Katugampola, U., On Generalized Fractional Integrals and Derivatives, Ph.D. Dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, August, 2011.

[11] Khalil, R., Al Horani, M., Yousef, A. and Sababheh, M., A new de…nition of fractional derivative, Journal of Computational Apllied Mathematics, 264 (2014), 65-70.

(16)

[12] Kilbas, A. A., Srivastava H.M. and Trujillo, J.J., Theory and Applications of Fractional Diferential Equations, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2006.

[13] Kiryakova, V., On two Saigos fractional integral operator in the class of univalent functions, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 9(2)(2006), 159-176.

[14] Kober, H., On fractional integrals and derivatives, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics (Oxford Series), (1940). xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[15] Mubeen S. and Habibullah, G. M., k-Fractional integrals and applications, International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, 7(2012), 89–94.

[16] Set, E., Tomar, M. and Sarikaya, M., On generalized Gruss type inequalities for k-fractional integrals, Appl. Math. Comput. (2015).

[17] Saigo, M., A remark on integral operators involving the Gauss hypergeometric function, Rep. College General Ed., Kyushu Univ., 11 (1978), 135-143.

[18] Sarikaya, M., Dahmani, Z., Kiris, M. and Ahmad, F., (k; s)-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and applications, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., (2016).

[19] Sroysang, B., More on Reverses of Minkowskis Integral Inequality, Mathematica Aeterna, Vol. 3, (2013), no. 7, 597-600.

[20] Sulaiman, W. T., Reverses of Minkowski’s, Hölder’s, and Hardy’s integral inequalities, Int. J. Mod. Math. Sci., (2012), 1(1), 1424.

[21] Raina, R.K., On generalized Wright’s hypergeometric functions and fractional calculus oper-ators, East Asian Math. J., 21(2) (2005), 191-203.

[22] Tunç, T., Budak, H., Usta, F. and Sarikaya, M. Z., On new generalized fractional inte-gral operators and related fractional inequalities, ResearchGate Article, Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313650587.

Current address : Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce-TURKEY

E-mail address : fuatusta@duzce.edu.tr

ORCID Address: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7750-6910

Current address : Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce-TURKEY

E-mail address : hsyn.budak@gmail.com

ORCID Address: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-955X

Current address : Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce-TURKEY

E-mail address : fatmaertugral14@gmail.com

ORCID Address: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-8388

Current address : Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce-TURKEY

E-mail address : sarikayamz@gmail.com

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Changes in maternal behavior have been observed in mice, rats and other laboratory animals a il]. Differences in maternal aggression have been observed between

[Ammâ odaların biri] yani anda hıfzı şart olunan oda [kargir ve diğeri] yani müstevda‘ın hilâf-ı şart olarak hıfz ittiği oda [ahşap olmak] ya biri

Comparison of the con- trol group with the GTx-applied 48-hour, 25 mg/kg RH-applied 48-hour, 50 mg/kg RH-applied 24- and 48-hour, 75 mg/kg RH-applied 24- and 48-hour groups has shown

The aim of this study is to determine the influence of short duration rotational grazing in a pasture area grazed in an uncontrolled and heavy way for a long time on some

Of the mechanical properties; experiments of compression strength parallel to grain were conducted in accordance with TS 2595 (1977), bending strength in accordance with TS

The comparison curves of the tensile strength, tear strength, elongation and hardness values showed that the types and rates of UV stabilizers had no effect on the

However, the most successful results for all tested properties were determined in the styrene pretreated samples in which hygroscopicity decreased and dimensional stability

Betonun mekaniksel özelliklerinin çarpma dayanımına etkisinin incelenmesi konusundaki çalıĢmada; 30x15 cm ve 20x10 cm boyutlarında standart silindir ile 10x10x50 cm´